State v. Roman

634 So. 2d 291, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3060, 1994 WL 106198
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 31, 1994·No. No. 92-3626·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

When Mike Roman was originally sentenced, written reasons were stated for departure from the sentencing guidelines, as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(ll). The State agreed to downward departure, and Roman was placed on community control. He subsequently violated the terms and conditions of community control. However, as in State v. Nickerson, 541 So.2d 725 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), when imposing sentence after revoking community control, the court below did not provide a contemporaneous, written reason for a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. We, therefore, REVERSE Roman’s sentence and REMAND for resentencing within the guidelines. See Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990); Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990).

BARFIELD, WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Roman, 634 So. 2d 291, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3060, 1994 WL 106198 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

634 So. 2d 291 (State v. Roman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Franquiz v. State
682 So. 2d 536 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
State v. Brown
675 So. 2d 991 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
State v. Zlockower
650 So. 2d 692 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)