State v. Roman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Roman

472 So. 2d 886, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1789, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14435

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 23, 1985

DocketNo. 84-1594

StatusPublished

This text of 472 So. 2d 886 (State v. Roman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Roman, 472 So. 2d 886, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1789, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14435 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The facts in this appeal are indistinguishable from those in State v. Ridenour, 453 So.2d 193 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), where we held that the electronic surveillance of certain conversations of a defendant in his home conducted by an undercover police officer equipped with a “body bug” did not violate the fourth amendment which pro[887]*887tects against unreasonable searches and seizures. Pursuant to the recent amendment to article I, section 12 of the Florida Constitution, the rights secured by that provision shall be construed in accordance with the fourth amendment, as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court. Ri-denour.

The order of suppression is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The facts in this appeal are indistinguishable from those in State v. Ridenour, 453 So.2d 193 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), where we held that the electronic surveillance of certain conversations of a defendant in his home conducted by an undercover police officer equipped with a “body bug” did not violate the fourth amendment which pro[887]*887tects against unreasonable searches and seizures. Pursuant to the recent amendment to article I, section 12 of the Florida Constitution, the rights secured by that provision shall be construed in accordance with the fourth amendment, as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court. Ri-denour.

The order of suppression is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

472 So. 2d 886, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1789, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-roman-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack