State v. Roman
791 A.2d 567, 259 Conn. 920, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 70
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 67 Conn. App. 194 (AC 21586), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court was not required to hold a preliminary inquiry regarding the defendant’s claim of juror misconduct?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Roman, 791 A.2d 567, 259 Conn. 920, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 70 (Colo. 2002).
791 A.2d 567 (State v. Roman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roman v. Commissioner of Correction
229 Conn. App. 219 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2024)
State v. Roman
817 A.2d 100 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)