State v. Rollins

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Rollins

301 So. 2d 608, 1974 La. LEXIS 4035

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 11, 1974

DocketNo. 54810

StatusPublished

This text of 301 So. 2d 608 (State v. Rollins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rollins, 301 So. 2d 608, 1974 La. LEXIS 4035 (La. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

MARCUS, Justice.

Defendant, Charles Edward Rollins, was charged by bill of information with committing a battery with a dangerous weapon upon Rosa Bingham in violation of R.S. 14:34 on July 18, 1973. He was tried by jury and found guilty as charged. A four year sentence at hard labor was imposed. This conviction and sentence have been appealed to this Court.

No bills of exceptions were reserved during the trial of this matter. Only perfected bills, as required by Articles 844 and 845 C.Cr.P. will be considered for the purpose of appellate review; in their absence, we are limited on appeal to a review of the pleadings and proceedings for discoverable error. State v. Quinn, 288 So.2d 605 (La.1974) ; State v. McCurady, 286 So.2d 638 (La.1973) ; State v. Farner, 284 So.2d 573 (La.1973). We find none.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARCUS, Justice.

Defendant, Charles Edward Rollins, was charged by bill of information with committing a battery with a dangerous weapon upon Rosa Bingham in violation of R.S. 14:34 on July 18, 1973. He was tried by jury and found guilty as charged. A four year sentence at hard labor was imposed. This conviction and sentence have been appealed to this Court.

No bills of exceptions were reserved during the trial of this matter. Only perfected bills, as required by Articles 844 and 845 C.Cr.P. will be considered for the purpose of appellate review; in their absence, we are limited on appeal to a review of the pleadings and proceedings for discoverable error. State v. Quinn, 288 So.2d 605 (La.1974) ; State v. McCurady, 286 So.2d 638 (La.1973) ; State v. Farner, 284 So.2d 573 (La.1973). We find none.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 So. 2d 608, 1974 La. LEXIS 4035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rollins-la-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack