State v. Rollins

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Rollins

697 A.2d 361, 241 Conn. 921, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 262

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJune 25, 1997

DocketSC 15718

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 697 A.2d 361 (State v. Rollins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rollins, 697 A.2d 361, 241 Conn. 921, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 262 (Colo. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 162 (AC 14300), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s confession should have been suppressed by the trial court because (1) it was made after the defendant had [922]*922requested counsel and (2) the subsequent communication that led to the confession was not initiated by the defendant as required by Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S. Ct. 1880, 68 L. Ed. 2d 378 (1981), and its progeny?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15718. Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. James B. Streeto, in opposition. Decided June 25, 1997

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 162 (AC 14300), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s confession should have been suppressed by the trial court because (1) it was made after the defendant had [922]*922requested counsel and (2) the subsequent communication that led to the confession was not initiated by the defendant as required by Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S. Ct. 1880, 68 L. Ed. 2d 378 (1981), and its progeny?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15718. Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. James B. Streeto, in opposition. Decided June 25, 1997

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

697 A.2d 361, 241 Conn. 921, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rollins-conn-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack