State v. Rolley

37 S.W. 827, 135 Mo. 677, 1896 Mo. LEXIS 288
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedNovember 20, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 37 S.W. 827 (State v. Rolley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Rolley, 37 S.W. 827, 135 Mo. 677, 1896 Mo. LEXIS 288 (Mo. 1896).

Opinion

Sherwood, J.

The defendant, indicted for and convicted of obtaining money under false pretenses, and his punishment assessed at three years in the penitentiary, appeals to this court.

The defendant is not represented in this court by counsel and so we have examined the record. The indictment is in proper form, but it does not appear from the record nor from an indorsement upon it by the clerk, that the bill of exceptions was ever filed. In such circumstances, the supposed bill must be disre[678]*678garded as not being properly authenticated. Lafollette v. Thompson, 83 Mo. 199.

As there is no error in the record proper, we affirm the judgment.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Borders
128 S.W. 737 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1910)
Jaco v. Southern Missouri & Arkansas Railway Co.
68 S.W. 379 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1902)
Wilson v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad
66 S.W. 928 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1902)
Bates v. Ruth & Mengal Realty Co.
88 Mo. App. 550 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1901)
Finlay v. Gill
80 Mo. App. 458 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1899)
Ricketts v. Hart
73 Mo. App. 647 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 S.W. 827, 135 Mo. 677, 1896 Mo. LEXIS 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rolley-mo-1896.