State v. Rolen

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Rolen

DecidedFebruary 22, 2012

Docket2012-UP-085

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Rolen (State v. Rolen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rolen, (S.C. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Craig Rolen, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County
C. Victor Pyle, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-085
Submitted February 1, 2012 - Filed February 22, 2012

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Mark R. Farthing, all of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Craig Rolen appeals the plea judge's order, arguing the plea judge abused his discretion in denying Rolen's motion to withdraw a guilty plea. We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Thomason, 355 S.C. 278, 283, 584 S.E.2d 143, 145 (Ct. App. 2003) ("All that is required before a plea can be accepted is that the defendant understand the nature and crucial elements of the charges, the consequences of the plea, and the constitutional rights he is waiving, and that the record reflect a factual basis for the plea." (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); id. at 283, 584 S.E.2d at 146 ("However, once a defendant enters a guilty plea, whether to allow withdrawal of the plea is left to the sound discretion of the [plea judge]." (citation omitted)); State v. Riddle, 278 S.C. 148, 150, 292 S.E.2d 795, 796 (1982) (holding a determination the plea was voluntarily entered "will normally show the [plea] judge did not abuse his discretion" (citation omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Craig Rolen, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County
C. Victor Pyle, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-085
Submitted February 1, 2012 - Filed February 22, 2012

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Mark R. Farthing, all of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Craig Rolen appeals the plea judge's order, arguing the plea judge abused his discretion in denying Rolen's motion to withdraw a guilty plea. We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Thomason, 355 S.C. 278, 283, 584 S.E.2d 143, 145 (Ct. App. 2003) ("All that is required before a plea can be accepted is that the defendant understand the nature and crucial elements of the charges, the consequences of the plea, and the constitutional rights he is waiving, and that the record reflect a factual basis for the plea." (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); id. at 283, 584 S.E.2d at 146 ("However, once a defendant enters a guilty plea, whether to allow withdrawal of the plea is left to the sound discretion of the [plea judge]." (citation omitted)); State v. Riddle, 278 S.C. 148, 150, 292 S.E.2d 795, 796 (1982) (holding a determination the plea was voluntarily entered "will normally show the [plea] judge did not abuse his discretion" (citation omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Rolen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rolen-scctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack