State v. Rolando Terrell (077730) (Essex County and Statewide)

173 A.3d 190, 231 N.J. 170
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 29, 2017·No. A-25-16·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM

The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority’s PER CURIAM opinion, reported at — N.J. Super. -, - A.3d - (App. Div. 2016).

CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER and JUSTICES LaVECCHIA, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, SOLOMON, and TIMPONE join in this opinion. JUSTICE ALBIN filed a separate opinion, dissenting in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rolando Terrell (077730) (Essex County and Statewide), 173 A.3d 190, 231 N.J. 170 (N.J. 2017).

173 A.3d 190 (State v. Rolando Terrell (077730) (Essex County and Statewide)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related