State v. Rokos

570 So. 2d 1154, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9680, 1990 WL 205499
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 19, 1990
DocketNo. 89-3201
StatusPublished

This text of 570 So. 2d 1154 (State v. Rokos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Rokos, 570 So. 2d 1154, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9680, 1990 WL 205499 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand for further proceedings in accord with section 849.25(2), Florida Statutes (1985). See Charatz v. State, 555 So.2d 1303 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). We agree with the state that under section 849.25(2) the court could not withhold adjudication following appellee’s plea of guilty. On remand, appellee should be afforded an opportunity to withdraw his plea.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Charatz v. State
555 So. 2d 1303 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
570 So. 2d 1154, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9680, 1990 WL 205499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rokos-fladistctapp-1990.