State v. Rohling

359 S.W.3d 567, 2012 WL 612483, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 262
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 28, 2012
DocketWD 73753, WD 74597
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 359 S.W.3d 567 (State v. Rohling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Rohling, 359 S.W.3d 567, 2012 WL 612483, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 262 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Candice Rohling was convicted of burglary in the second degree and misdemeanor receiving stolen property in the Circuit Court of Pettis County. She appeals the burglary conviction, arguing that there was insufficient evidence that she was present at the scene of the burglary, or that she possessed the requisite intent to steal. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brandon v. Brandon
359 S.W.3d 567 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
359 S.W.3d 567, 2012 WL 612483, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rohling-moctapp-2012.