State v. Rogers
This text of 444 P.2d 54 (State v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appeal from an alleged erroneous failure to grant a motion to suppress evidence. Affirmed.
This case comes to us under a so-called “Partial Transcript.” One point only is urged: That there was an illegal search of a car owned by one of the defendants after an alleged nocturnal sortie at a laundromat where coins were purloined by defendants. The -veniremen found that allegation factually to be true. An examination of the record as partially designated impresses us that there was no illegal or unreasonable search and seizure, and we so hold.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
444 P.2d 54, 21 Utah 2d 234, 1968 Utah LEXIS 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rogers-utah-1968.