State v. Rogers
444 P.2d 54, 21 Utah 2d 234, 1968 Utah LEXIS 628
Opinions
Appeal from an alleged erroneous failure to grant a motion to suppress evidence. Affirmed.
This case comes to us under a so-called “Partial Transcript.” One point only is urged: That there was an illegal search of a car owned by one of the defendants after an alleged nocturnal sortie at a laundromat where coins were purloined by defendants. The -veniremen found that allegation factually to be true. An examination of the record as partially designated impresses us that there was no illegal or unreasonable search and seizure, and we so hold.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Rogers, 444 P.2d 54, 21 Utah 2d 234, 1968 Utah LEXIS 628 (Utah 1968).
444 P.2d 54 (State v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mapp v. Ohio
367 U.S. 643 (Supreme Court, 1961)
State v. Hines
307 P.2d 887 (Utah Supreme Court, 1957)
Hernandez v. People
385 P.2d 996 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1963)
Heffley v. State
423 P.2d 666 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1967)
Dyett v. Turner
439 P.2d 266 (Utah Supreme Court, 1968)
Stewart v. People
426 P.2d 545 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1967)
State v. Cooper
201 P.2d 764 (Utah Supreme Court, 1949)
Schlatter v. McCarthy
196 P.2d 968 (Utah Supreme Court, 1948)