State v. Rogers
This text of State v. Rogers (State v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Raymond Dean Rogers, Appellant.
Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-379
Submitted April 21, 2004 Filed June
17, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellant Defender Aileen P. Clare, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia; and Solicitor Thomas E. Pope, of York, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Raymond Dean Rogers was indicted for and pled guilty to breach of trust with fraudulent intent. Rogers appellate counsel submitted a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating she has reviewed the record and has concluded Rogers appeal is without merit. Rogers filed a pro se brief with the court.
After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits. Accordingly, we dismiss Rogers appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved. [1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
[1] Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving the issues on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rules 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Rogers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rogers-scctapp-2004.