State v. Rogers

708 P.2d 650, 76 Or. App. 390, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3997
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 14, 1985·No. 10-84-07913, 10-84-07914, 10-84-09595, 10-84-09596, 10-84-09597, 10-84-09676; CA A35637, A35638, A35639, A35640, A35641, A35642·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of six counts of burglary in the first degree. He appeals the convictions on four of the counts which were based on his being armed with burglar’s tools. He contends that his convictions in those cases must be modified to convictions of burglary in the second degree, because the tools in question were not established to be burglar’s tools. ORS 164.235(2). The state concedes that defendant is correct. We agree. State v. Graves, 299 Or 189, 700 P2d 244 (1985); State v. Sells, 299 Or 198, 702 P2d 68 (1985).

In cases 10-84-07913, 10-84-07914, 10-84-09595 and 10-84-09676 the judgments are vacated and remanded for entry of judgment of conviction for burglary in the second degree in each case and for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rogers, 708 P.2d 650, 76 Or. App. 390, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3997 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).

708 P.2d 650 (State v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Sells
702 P.2d 68 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1985)
State v. Graves
700 P.2d 244 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1985)