State v. Rogers
19 A.2d 886, 126 N.J.L. 428, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 334
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Rogers, 19 A.2d 886, 126 N.J.L. 428, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 334 (N.J. 1941).
19 A.2d 886 (State v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State of Oregon v. Holland
277 P.2d 386 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1954)
State v. Griffith
81 A.2d 382 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)