State v. Rogers

146 A. 917, 105 N.J.L. 654, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 297
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 20, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Tbenohard, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfibld, Dear, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Uone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rogers, 146 A. 917, 105 N.J.L. 654, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 297 (N.J. 1929).

146 A. 917 (State v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

NOBACK EX REL. NOBACK v. Town of Montclair
110 A.2d 339 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)