State v. . Rogers

132 S.E. 927, 191 N.C. 826, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 195
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 14, 1926
StatusPublished

This text of 132 S.E. 927 (State v. . Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Rogers, 132 S.E. 927, 191 N.C. 826, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 195 (N.C. 1926).

Opinion

*827 Per Curiam.

Tbe defendant was convicted of a breach of tbe prohibition laws. He entered a “broadside exception” to tbe charge which, of course, cannot be entertained. The other exceptions are purely personal and call for no discussion. They must be overruled.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 S.E. 927, 191 N.C. 826, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rogers-nc-1926.