State v. Rogers
This text of 696 So. 2d 1329 (State v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The state challenges the trial court’s order suppressing the appellee’s confession as not being freely and voluntarily given. Because we conclude that the record supports this factual finding, and we are not at liberty to effectively substitute our judgment for that of the trial court on this issue, DeConingh v. [1330]*1330State, 433 So.2d 501, 504 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1005, 104 S.Ct. 995, 79 L.Ed.2d 228 (1984); State v. Belcher, 520 So.2d 303, 305 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 529 So.2d 695 (Fla.) and cert. denied, 488 U.S. 912, 109 S.Ct. 270, 102 L.Ed.2d 258 (1988); State v. Gonzalez, 447 So.2d 1015, 1016 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); State v. Garcia, 431 So.2d 651, 651 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), we affirm.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
696 So. 2d 1329, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8428, 1997 WL 408718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rogers-fladistctapp-1997.