State v. Rogers

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Rogers

556 So. 2d 1126, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2566, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6210, 1989 WL 133059

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 8, 1989·No. No. 89-588·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing because in sentencing appellee the trial court relied on the guidelines in effect at the time of the sentence as opposed to those in effect at the time of the commission of the crime. State v. Williams, 546 So.2d 809 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

We reject appellant’s challenge to the constitutionality of the statute under which he was convicted because he did not raise it in the trial court when he pled no contest and did not raise the issue below. Furthermore, the constitutionality of the statute has been upheld. State v. Burch, 545 So.2d 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing because in sentencing appellee the trial court relied on the guidelines in effect at the time of the sentence as opposed to those in effect at the time of the commission of the crime. State v. Williams, 546 So.2d 809 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

We reject appellant’s challenge to the constitutionality of the statute under which he was convicted because he did not raise it in the trial court when he pled no contest and did not raise the issue below. Furthermore, the constitutionality of the statute has been upheld. State v. Burch, 545 So.2d 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., concur.

State v. Rogers, 556 So. 2d 1126, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2566, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6210, 1989 WL 133059 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

556 So. 2d 1126 (State v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related