State v. Roedner

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Roedner

896 S.W.2d 501, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 634, 1995 WL 128442

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 28, 1995·No. Nos. 64722, 66310·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Kent M. Roedner, appeals his convictions for attempted rape and attempted sodomy. While not briefed on appeal and therefore abandoned, Defendant originally consolidated with the direct appeal an appeal from denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.

We find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Kent M. Roedner, appeals his convictions for attempted rape and attempted sodomy. While not briefed on appeal and therefore abandoned, Defendant originally consolidated with the direct appeal an appeal from denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.

We find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.

State v. Roedner, 896 S.W.2d 501, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 634, 1995 WL 128442 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

896 S.W.2d 501 (State v. Roedner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.