State v. Roebuck

657 So. 2d 1009, 1995 La. LEXIS 1748, 1995 WL 407836
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 30, 1995·No. No. 94-KH-1127·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In re Roebuck, Terril; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 326-181; Criminal District Court, Div. “I”, No. 333-982; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 94KW-0417.

Granted for the purpose of transferring the application to the district court for a determination of indigence. If the district court finds that relator is currently indigent, it is ordered to delete only that portion of relator’s sentence which provides for a jail term in the event of default of payment of the fine. An indigent may not be incarcerated because he is unable to pay a fine which is part of his sentence. Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660, 103 S.Ct. 2064, 76 L.Ed.2d 221 (1963); State ex rel. Rodriguez v. State, 576 So.2d 518 (La.1991); State v. Coleman, 576 So.2d 518 (La.1991).

JOHNSON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Roebuck, 657 So. 2d 1009, 1995 La. LEXIS 1748, 1995 WL 407836 (La. 1995).

657 So. 2d 1009 (State v. Roebuck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bridges
251 So. 3d 661 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018)
State v. Lee
243 So. 3d 1133 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2017)
State v. Matt
91 So. 3d 1252 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2012)