State v. Roe

802 N.E.2d 1124, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1450
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 3, 2004·No. 1987-1879·Published

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 86AP-59. Upon consideration of appellant’s pro se motion for stay of execution,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Roe, 802 N.E.2d 1124, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1450 (Ohio 2004).

802 N.E.2d 1124 (State v. Roe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.