State v. Rodriguez

935 S.W.2d 163, 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 248, 1996 WL 726855
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 18, 1996
DocketNo. 1364-96
StatusPublished

This text of 935 S.W.2d 163 (State v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Rodriguez, 935 S.W.2d 163, 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 248, 1996 WL 726855 (Tex. 1996).

Opinion

MANSFIELD, Judge,

dissenting to refusal of State’s Petition for Discretionary Review.

For the reasons expressed in Smith v. State, 897 S.W.2d 348 (Tex.Crim.App.1995), I respectfully dissent to the refusal of the State’s Petition for Discretionary Review in this cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
897 S.W.2d 348 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
935 S.W.2d 163, 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 248, 1996 WL 726855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rodriguez-texcrimapp-1996.