State v. Rodriguez
375 A.2d 659, 73 N.J. 463, 1977 N.J. LEXIS 217
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford and Soheeiber — 6.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Rodriguez, 375 A.2d 659, 73 N.J. 463, 1977 N.J. LEXIS 217 (N.J. 1977).
375 A.2d 659 (State v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
State v. Seven Thousand Dollars
642 A.2d 967 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1994)
State v. American Banking Insurance
622 A.2d 261 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1993)
State v. United States Currency
570 A.2d 1304 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1990)
State v. One 1978 Ford Van
527 A.2d 935 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1987)
State v. Durst
678 P.2d 1126 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1984)
Deering v. Deering
437 A.2d 883 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1981)
State v. Rose
414 A.2d 600 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1980)