State v. Rodriguez

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Rodriguez

991 S.W.2d 145, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1558, 1998 WL 527231

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 25, 1998

DocketNo. 72751

StatusPublished

This text of 991 S.W.2d 145 (State v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rodriguez, 991 S.W.2d 145, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1558, 1998 WL 527231 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Leevuwenhoeck Rodriquez, appeals from his judgments of conviction, after a jury trial, of forcible rape, robbery in the first degree, felonious restraint, burglary in the first degree, and four counts of armed criminal action. The trial court sentenced defendant to a term of life imprisonment for forcible rape, to a term of life imprisonment for first degree robbery, to imprisonment for seven years for felonious restraint, fifteen years for first degree burglary, and to fifty years for each of the four armed criminal action convictions. Defendant was sentenced as a prior offender, with all terms of imprisonment to be served consecutively.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgments of conviction are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Leevuwenhoeck Rodriquez, appeals from his judgments of conviction, after a jury trial, of forcible rape, robbery in the first degree, felonious restraint, burglary in the first degree, and four counts of armed criminal action. The trial court sentenced defendant to a term of life imprisonment for forcible rape, to a term of life imprisonment for first degree robbery, to imprisonment for seven years for felonious restraint, fifteen years for first degree burglary, and to fifty years for each of the four armed criminal action convictions. Defendant was sentenced as a prior offender, with all terms of imprisonment to be served consecutively.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgments of conviction are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

991 S.W.2d 145, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1558, 1998 WL 527231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rodriguez-moctapp-1998.