State v. Rodriguez

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Rodriguez

753 So. 2d 223, 2000 La. LEXIS 199, 2000 WL 146900

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 24, 2000

DocketNo. 00-KK-0179

StatusPublished

This text of 753 So. 2d 223 (State v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rodriguez, 753 So. 2d 223, 2000 La. LEXIS 199, 2000 WL 146900 (La. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Rodriguez, Charles Jr.; — Defendant; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. A, Nos. 84077; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 00 KW 0105.

Granted. Trial of this case set to begin on January 25, 2000, is hereby stayed and this case is remanded to the district court. The trial judge is directed to grant the motion for a continuance and to provide retained and appointed counsel reasonable time in which to prepare for trial. The district court shall also conduct promptly a hearing for purposes of resolving the issue of funding of defense experts at both the guilt and penalty phases of trial.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Rodriguez, Charles Jr.; — Defendant; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs, Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court Div. A, Nos. 84077; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 00 KW 0105.

Granted. Trial of this case set to begin on January 25, 2000, is hereby stayed and this case is remanded to the district court. The trial judge is directed to grant the motion for a continuance and to provide retained and appointed counsel reasonable time in which to prepare for trial. The district court shall also conduct promptly a hearing for purposes of resolving the issue of funding of defense experts at both the guilt and penalty phases of trial.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

753 So. 2d 223, 2000 La. LEXIS 199, 2000 WL 146900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rodriguez-la-2000.