State v. Rodriguez

885 So. 2d 925, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14998, 2004 WL 2290626
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 904 So. 2d 594
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 13, 2004·No. No. 3D03-639·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s finding that the State’s discovery violations prejudiced the defendant, Jose Rodriguez, in the preparation of his defense was not supported by the record. Therefore, the trial court abused its discretion by granting the defendant’s motion for discharge for violation of the speedy trial rule. State v. Guzman, 667 So.2d 989 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); State v. Brown, 527 So.2d 209, 210 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 534 So.2d 398 (Fla.1988); State v. Del Gaudio, 445 So.2d 605, 608 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 453 So.2d 45 (Fla.1984).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rodriguez, 885 So. 2d 925, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14998, 2004 WL 2290626 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

885 So. 2d 925 (State v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Guzman
667 So. 2d 989 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
State v. Brown
527 So. 2d 209 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
State v. Del Gaudio
445 So. 2d 605 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)