State v. Rodriguez

707 So. 2d 942, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2647, 1998 WL 191138
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 673 So. 2d 187
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 18, 1998·No. No. 97-0976·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse because the trial court was without authority to deviate from the mandatory minimum sentence required under section 893.13(l)(c)l, Florida Statutes (1995), which provides that a person convicted of violating it “must be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 3 calendar years.” See State v. Swider, 654 So.2d 562 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); State v. Randall, 627 So.2d 571 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Hill v. State, 624 So.2d 826 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). On remand, appellee must be given an opportunity to withdraw her plea, if she desires to do so. See State v. Nichols, 536 So.2d 1052 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

STONE, C.J., and KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rodriguez, 707 So. 2d 942, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2647, 1998 WL 191138 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

707 So. 2d 942 (State v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. State
624 So. 2d 826 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
State v. Nichols
536 So. 2d 1052 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
State v. Randall
627 So. 2d 571 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
State v. Swider
654 So. 2d 562 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)