State v. Rodriguez

483 So. 2d 751, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 288, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6022
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 28, 1986
DocketNo. 85-373
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 483 So. 2d 751 (State v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Rodriguez, 483 So. 2d 751, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 288, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6022 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals an order dismissing the information against the defendants. We reverse. The state does not have an obligation to produce witnesses for deposition. State v. Valdes, 443 So.2d 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); State v. Roig, 305 So.2d 836 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). Once the state revealed the name and address of the informant, it fulfilled its obligation. Consequently, there was no discovery violation and the imposition of a sanction against the state, in this case dismissal of the information, was erroneous. Valdes.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Florida v. Lewis Stouffer
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2026
State v. DEVRICK BOYKINS
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2020
Colby v. McNeill
595 So. 2d 115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
State v. Aronson
45 Fla. Supp. 2d 49 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1991)
State v. Williams
27 Fla. Supp. 2d 121 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1988)
State v. Rojas
508 So. 2d 449 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
State v. Mena
505 So. 2d 681 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
483 So. 2d 751, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 288, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rodriguez-fladistctapp-1986.