State v. Rodriguez

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Rodriguez

920 So. 2d 624, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 495, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 1342, 2005 WL 1475362

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 23, 2005

DocketNo. SC04-390

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 920 So. 2d 624 (State v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rodriguez, 920 So. 2d 624, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 495, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 1342, 2005 WL 1475362 (Fla. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

WELLS, J.

We have on appeal a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal declaring invalid a state statute. Rodriguez v. State, 906 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). Rodriguez also expressly and directly conflicts with the decision in Sult v. State, 839 So.2d 798 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), (3), Fla. Const.

For the reasons stated in our opinion in Suit v. State, 906 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 2005), we affirm the decision of the Third District in Rodriguez.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and ANSTEAD, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ„ concur. CANTERO and BELL, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI