State v. Rodriguez

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Rodriguez

896 A.2d 102, 277 Conn. 930, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 129

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 31, 2006·No. SC 17637·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn. App. 739 (AC 25393), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly affirmed the trial court’s decision denying defense counsel’s motion to withdraw?”

*931 Erik T. Lohr, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided March 31, 2006

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn. App. 739 (AC 25393), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly affirmed the trial court’s decision denying defense counsel’s motion to withdraw?”

*931 Erik T. Lohr, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided March 31, 2006

State v. Rodriguez, 896 A.2d 102, 277 Conn. 930, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 129 (Colo. 2006).

Pincite

896 A.2d 102 (State v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related