State v. Rodriguez

896 A.2d 102, 277 Conn. 930, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 129
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 31, 2006
DocketSC 17637
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 896 A.2d 102 (State v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Rodriguez, 896 A.2d 102, 277 Conn. 930, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 129 (Colo. 2006).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn. App. 739 (AC 25393), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly affirmed the trial court’s decision denying defense counsel’s motion to withdraw?”

*931 Erik T. Lohr, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided March 31, 2006

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Rodriguez
917 A.2d 959 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
896 A.2d 102, 277 Conn. 930, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rodriguez-conn-2006.