State v. Rodgers
This text of 254 P. 1036 (State v. Rodgers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Francis Rodgers was duly informed against, tried and found guilty of the larceny of chickens of the value of $25. He has appealed, and contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. This is the sole question presented. We have carefully examined the evidence as abstracted and conclude not only that there is an abundance of competent substantial evidence to support the verdict, but that no other just verdict could have been reached from the evidence. It is not necessary to detail or even to summarize the evidence.
The judgment of the court below is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 P. 1036, 123 Kan. 253, 1927 Kan. LEXIS 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rodgers-kan-1927.