State v. Rodgers

357 A.2d 513, 171 Conn. 729
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 4, 1976·Published

Opinion

Although it appears that the defendant is represented by counsel, the motion for review of the denial by the Superior Court in the judicial district of Waterbury of his “Motion for Discharge of Case” has been filed pro se. That motion for review is granted, but the relief sought therein is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rodgers, 357 A.2d 513, 171 Conn. 729 (Colo. 1976).

357 A.2d 513 (State v. Rodgers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.