State v. Roddy
117 S.E.2d 401, 253 N.C. 574, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 676
This text of 117 S.E.2d 401 (State v. Roddy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Roddy, 117 S.E.2d 401, 253 N.C. 574, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 676 (N.C. 1960).
Opinion
Defendant excepts to the facts found by the court, but supported by the evidence as they are, the findings are conclusive. Based on the finding that there was no newly discovered evidence, there was no ground on which defendant’s motion could be granted. S. v. Casey, 201 N.C. 620, 161 S.E. 81. The judgment denying the motion is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Britt
360 S.E.2d 660 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1987)
State v. Nickerson
359 S.E.2d 760 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1987)
State v. Shelton
205 S.E.2d 316 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
117 S.E.2d 401, 253 N.C. 574, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-roddy-nc-1960.