State v. Roddy
117 S.E.2d 401, 253 N.C. 574, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 676
Opinion
Defendant excepts to the facts found by the court, but supported by the evidence as they are, the findings are conclusive. Based on the finding that there was no newly discovered evidence, there was no ground on which defendant’s motion could be granted. S. v. Casey, 201 N.C. 620, 161 S.E. 81. The judgment denying the motion is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Roddy, 117 S.E.2d 401, 253 N.C. 574, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 676 (N.C. 1960).
117 S.E.2d 401 (State v. Roddy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Britt
360 S.E.2d 660 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1987)
State v. Nickerson
359 S.E.2d 760 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1987)
State v. Shelton
205 S.E.2d 316 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1974)