State v. Roby

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Roby

505 S.W.3d 873, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1347, 2016 WL 7439117

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 27, 2016

DocketWD 79224

StatusPublished

This text of 505 S.W.3d 873 (State v. Roby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Roby, 505 S.W.3d 873, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1347, 2016 WL 7439117 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

Frank Roby, III, appeals from his convictions for first-degree statutory sodomy with a person less than 12 years old and attempted statutory rape with a person less than 12 years old. He contends the circuit court plainly-erred in admitting a forensic .interviewer’s expert testimony. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the convictions. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam

Frank Roby, III, appeals from his convictions for first-degree statutory sodomy with a person less than 12 years old and attempted statutory rape with a person less than 12 years old. He contends the circuit court plainly-erred in admitting a forensic .interviewer’s expert testimony. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the convictions. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

505 S.W.3d 873, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1347, 2016 WL 7439117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-roby-moctapp-2016.