State v. Roby

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Roby

505 S.W.3d 873, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1347, 2016 WL 7439117

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 27, 2016·No. WD 79224·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

Frank Roby, III, appeals from his convictions for first-degree statutory sodomy with a person less than 12 years old and attempted statutory rape with a person less than 12 years old. He contends the circuit court plainly-erred in admitting a forensic .interviewer’s expert testimony. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the convictions. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam

Frank Roby, III, appeals from his convictions for first-degree statutory sodomy with a person less than 12 years old and attempted statutory rape with a person less than 12 years old. He contends the circuit court plainly-erred in admitting a forensic .interviewer’s expert testimony. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the convictions. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Roby, 505 S.W.3d 873, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1347, 2016 WL 7439117 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

505 S.W.3d 873 (State v. Roby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.