State v. Robinson
This text of State v. Robinson (State v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
The State, Respondent,
v.
Roland Robinson, Petitioner.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal From Georgetown County
John M. Milling, Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2009-MO-020
Heard April 8, 2009 Filed April 27, 2009
AFFIRMED
Appellate Defender Lanelle C. Durant, of South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia, and Solicitor John G. Hembree, of Conway, for Respondents.
PER CURIAM: We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals order dismissing petitioners direct appeal. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Serrette, 375 S.C. 650, 654 S.E.2d 554 (Ct. App. 2007) (dismissing direct criminal appeal in case where appellant was arrested on a bench warrant over ten years after his trial in absentia; the Court of Appeals found that Serrettes actions in remaining a fugitive and resulting destruction of the trial transcript justified appellate sanction of dismissal).
AFFIRMED.
WALLER, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE, PLEICONES, BEATTY, JJ., and Acting Justices James E. Moore and Donna S. Strom, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Robinson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-robinson-sc-2009.