State v. Robinson

432 P.2d 264, 78 N.M. 420
CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 2, 1967
Docket8344
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 432 P.2d 264 (State v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Robinson, 432 P.2d 264, 78 N.M. 420 (N.M. 1967).

Opinion

OPINION

WOOD, Judge, Court of Appeals.

Defendant was denied post-conviction relief under § 21-1-1(93) N.M.S.A.1953 (Interim Supp.1966). In his appeal he asserts (1) that he was denied counsel when taken before the justice of the peace and (2) that he was not given and did not waive a preliminary hearing.

Defendant pleaded not guilty at his arraignment in district court. He was tried and found guilty by a jury. He was represented by counsel at arraignment and trial. He does not claim that his counsel was incompetent.

Absent a showing of prejudice, the plea at arraignment waived prior defects in the proceedings. Thus, by the plea: (1) he waived the claim that he was denied counsel in the proceedings prior to arraignment, State v. Cisneros, 77 N.M. 361, 423 P.2d 45 (1967); State v. Blackwell, 76 N.M. 445, 415 P.2d 563 (1966); Sanders v. Cox, 74 N.M. 524, 395 P.2d 353 (1964) ; and (2) he waived his right to a preliminary hearing. State v. Darrah, 76 N.M. 671, 417 P.2d 805 (1966); State v. Blackwell, supra; Sanders v. Cox, supra.

Here, while prejudice is claimed, it is not shown. Thus, defendant fails to set forth a basis for post-conviction relief. State v. Cisneros, supra; State v. Raburn, 76 N.M. 681, 417 P.2d 813 (1966); Sanders v. Cox, supra.

The order denying relief is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

NQBLE and MOISE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Gillihan
514 P.2d 33 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1973)
State v. Lopez
506 P.2d 344 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1973)
Woods v. State
501 P.2d 692 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1972)
State v. Hibbs
487 P.2d 150 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1971)
Robinson v. State
486 P.2d 69 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1971)
Pena v. State
466 P.2d 897 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1970)
State v. Leyba
453 P.2d 211 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1969)
State v. Losolla
442 P.2d 786 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1968)
State v. Barton
439 P.2d 719 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1968)
State v. McCormick
439 P.2d 239 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1968)
State v. Simien
437 P.2d 708 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1968)
State v. Sexton
437 P.2d 155 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1968)
State v. Archie
432 P.2d 408 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
432 P.2d 264, 78 N.M. 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-robinson-nm-1967.