State v. Robinson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Robinson

216 S.E.2d 497, 26 N.C. App. 620, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2129

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedJuly 16, 1975

DocketNo. 7526SC318

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 216 S.E.2d 497 (State v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Robinson, 216 S.E.2d 497, 26 N.C. App. 620, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2129 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant’s assignments of error Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are deemed abandoned, since no exceptions supporting them are [622]*622brought forward in defendant’s brief and no argument or authority is stated in support of them. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

In his sole remaining assignment of error defendant excepts to the signing and entry of the order revoking his probation and to the signing and entry of the judgments and commitments upon revocation of his suspended sentence. These exceptions present the face of the record for review. State v. Brown, 20 N.C. App. 483, 201 S.E. 2d 577 (1974), and cases cited therein. We have examined the record proper and' find no error.

No error.

Judges Vaughn and Clark concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI