State v. Robinson

216 S.E.2d 497, 26 N.C. App. 620, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2129
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided July 16, 1975·No. No. 7526SC318·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant’s assignments of error Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are deemed abandoned, since no exceptions supporting them are [622] brought forward in defendant’s brief and no argument or authority is stated in support of them. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

In his sole remaining assignment of error defendant excepts to the signing and entry of the order revoking his probation and to the signing and entry of the judgments and commitments upon revocation of his suspended sentence. These exceptions present the face of the record for review. State v. Brown, 20 N.C. App. 483, 201 S.E. 2d 577 (1974), and cases cited therein. We have examined the record proper and' find no error.

No error.

Judges Vaughn and Clark concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Robinson, 216 S.E.2d 497, 26 N.C. App. 620, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 2129 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975).

216 S.E.2d 497 (State v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griffin v. Griffin
263 S.E.2d 39 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)
State v. Hodges
237 S.E.2d 576 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1977)