State v. Robinson

358 S.W.3d 167, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1598, 2011 WL 6042373
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 6, 2011·No. ED 95248·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

LaVincent Robinson appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence, after a jury convicted him of one count of first-degree robbery, two counts of first-degree assault, and three counts of armed criminal action. Defendant argues that the trial court erred in overruling his Batson objections and allowing the State to remove three African-American venireper-sons by peremptory challenge. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Robinson, 358 S.W.3d 167, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1598, 2011 WL 6042373 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

358 S.W.3d 167 (State v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related