State v. Robinson
This text of 26 A. 1092 (State v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only exception in this case worthy of consideration is, whether an erroneous date in the caption of an indictment, showing it to have been found in Januaiy, 1891,. instead of January, 1892, as appears from the clerk’s certificate' upon the back of it, is a fatal defect, the offense being charged and proved to have been committed in November, 1891.
It is settled law in Massachusetts that such an error is harmless. Commonwealth v. Hines, 101 Mass. 33 ; Commonwealth v. Smith, 108 Mass. 486 ; Commonwealth v. Brown, 116 Mass. 339. We see no reason why the same doctrine should not be held in this State.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A. 1092, 85 Me. 147, 1892 Me. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-robinson-me-1892.