State v. Robinson

50 So. 3d 156, 2010 La. LEXIS 2831, 2010 WL 5129846
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 17, 2010·No. 2010-K-0924·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM. *

GRANTED. The judgment of the court of appeal vacating the defendant’s conviction, habitual offender adjudication, and sentence is reversed. The State concedes *157 the trial court failed to determine whether the defendant was competent to proceed prior to commencing jury trial; however, the State contends the matter should be remanded to the trial court for a determination of whether a nunc pro tunc finding of competency remains possible. We agree. Per State v. Snyder, 98-1078 (La.4/14/99), 750 So.2d 882, we remand the matter to the trial court to determine whether a meaningful inquiry can be had regarding defendant’s competency. If it is found that a meaningful retrospective competency hearing is possible, we order the hearing to be conducted and the issue to be determined.

JOHNSON, J., would deny the writ application.
*

Chief Justice Catherine D. Kimball not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Robinson, 50 So. 3d 156, 2010 La. LEXIS 2831, 2010 WL 5129846 (La. 2010).

50 So. 3d 156 (State v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Louisiana Versus Marvin Robinson
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Nicholas Pullen
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2019
State v. Robinson
102 So. 3d 922 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2012)
State v. Tyler
89 So. 3d 510 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2012)
State of Louisiana v. Renee Tyler
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2012