State v. Robinson

23 So. 3d 926, 2009 La. LEXIS 3667
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Robinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 So. 3d 926
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 17, 2009·No. No. 2009-KO-0628·Published

Opinion

In re Robinson, Darrin;- — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of East Feliciana, 14th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 07-CR-415; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2008 KA 0820.

Granted in part. This case is remanded to the court of appeal to address specifically defendant’s assignment of error that the trial court erred by permitting him to assert his right to self-representation without assuring itself that defendant made a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to counsel because “he kn[ew] what he [was] doing and his choice [was] made with eyes open.” Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 835, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 2541, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); State v. La-Fleur, 391 So.2d 445, 448 (La.1980) (“There should be some indication that the trial judge tried to assess the defendant’s literacy, competency, understanding and volition before he accepted the waiver of counsel.”) (citation omitted).

KIMBALL, C.J., would deny. GUIDRY, J., would deny. CLARK, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Robinson, 23 So. 3d 926, 2009 La. LEXIS 3667 (La. 2009).

23 So. 3d 926 (State v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Faretta v. California
422 U.S. 806 (Supreme Court, 1975)
State v. LaFleur
391 So. 2d 445 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1980)