State v. Robinson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Robinson

582 So. 2d 1258, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7594, 1991 WL 147536

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 7, 1991

DocketNo. 90-2095

StatusPublished

This text of 582 So. 2d 1258 (State v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Robinson, 582 So. 2d 1258, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7594, 1991 WL 147536 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals the trial court’s order that granted appellee’s motion to suppress. We reverse and remand for the trial court to reconsider the matter in light of the Supreme Court’s recent opinions in Florida v. Jimeno, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1801, 114 L.Ed.2d 297 (1991) and Florida v. Bostick, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2382, 115 L.Ed.2d 389 (1991).

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR RECONSIDERATION.

STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur. GARRETT, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals the trial court’s order that granted appellee’s motion to suppress. We reverse and remand for the trial court to reconsider the matter in light of the Supreme Court’s recent opinions in Florida v. Jimeno, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1801, 114 L.Ed.2d 297 (1991) and Florida v. Bostick, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2382, 115 L.Ed.2d 389 (1991).

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR RECONSIDERATION.

STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur. GARRETT, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

582 So. 2d 1258, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7594, 1991 WL 147536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-robinson-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack