State v. Robinson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Robinson

582 So. 2d 1258, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7594, 1991 WL 147536

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Robinson. Read the opinion of the Court — 565 So. 2d 730 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 7, 1991·No. No. 90-2095·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals the trial court’s order that granted appellee’s motion to suppress. We reverse and remand for the trial court to reconsider the matter in light of the Supreme Court’s recent opinions in Florida v. Jimeno, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1801, 114 L.Ed.2d 297 (1991) and Florida v. Bostick, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2382, 115 L.Ed.2d 389 (1991).

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR RECONSIDERATION.

STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur. GARRETT, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals the trial court’s order that granted appellee’s motion to suppress. We reverse and remand for the trial court to reconsider the matter in light of the Supreme Court’s recent opinions in Florida v. Jimeno, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1801, 114 L.Ed.2d 297 (1991) and Florida v. Bostick, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2382, 115 L.Ed.2d 389 (1991).

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR RECONSIDERATION.

STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur. GARRETT, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with opinion.

State v. Robinson, 582 So. 2d 1258, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7594, 1991 WL 147536 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

582 So. 2d 1258 (State v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related