State v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Robinson

943 A.2d 1102, 286 Conn. 902, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 146

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedFebruary 26, 2008

DocketSC 18115

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 943 A.2d 1102 (State v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Robinson, 943 A.2d 1102, 286 Conn. 902, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 146 (Colo. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 105 Conn. App. 179 (AC 27282), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the state had probable cause to arrest the defendant for criminal trespass in violation of General Statutes § 53a-109 (a) (1) even though no sign prohibiting entry was posted on the premises where the defendant was apprehended and there was a gateless opening in the front concrete wall of those premises?”

*903 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18115. Elizabeth M. Inkster, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided February 26, 2008

ROGERS, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 105 Conn. App. 179 (AC 27282), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the state had probable cause to arrest the defendant for criminal trespass in violation of General Statutes § 53a-109 (a) (1) even though no sign prohibiting entry was posted on the premises where the defendant was apprehended and there was a gateless opening in the front concrete wall of those premises?”

*903 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18115. Elizabeth M. Inkster, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided February 26, 2008

ROGERS, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

943 A.2d 1102, 286 Conn. 902, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-robinson-conn-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack