State v. Robins

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Robins

648 A.2d 166, 231 Conn. 917, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 346

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 20, 1994·No. SC 15046·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 694 (AC 11321), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[918] Decided September 20, 1994 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15046. Neal Cone, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Mary H. Lesser, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

“Whether the Appellate Court correctly decided that the state did not have to show as an element of larceny by defrauding a public community that the defendant obtained benefits to which he was not otherwise entitled.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 694 (AC 11321), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[918] Decided September 20, 1994 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15046. Neal Cone, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Mary H. Lesser, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

“Whether the Appellate Court correctly decided that the state did not have to show as an element of larceny by defrauding a public community that the defendant obtained benefits to which he was not otherwise entitled.”

State v. Robins, 648 A.2d 166, 231 Conn. 917, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 346 (Colo. 1994).

Pincite

648 A.2d 166 (State v. Robins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related