Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Robins

State v. Robins

648 A.2d 166, 231 Conn. 917, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 346
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 20, 1994
DocketSC 15046
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 648 A.2d 166 (State v. Robins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Robins, 648 A.2d 166, 231 Conn. 917, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 346 (Colo. 1994).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 694 (AC 11321), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[918]*918Decided September 20, 1994 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15046. Neal Cone, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Mary H. Lesser, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
“Whether the Appellate Court correctly decided that the state did not have to show as an element of larceny by defrauding a public community that the defendant obtained benefits to which he was not otherwise entitled.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Robins
660 A.2d 738 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
648 A.2d 166, 231 Conn. 917, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-robins-conn-1994.