State v. Robinette

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Robinette

818 P.2d 1299, 109 Or. App. 477, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1604

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedOctober 30, 1991

Docket90-02-30723; CA A67300

StatusPublished

This text of 818 P.2d 1299 (State v. Robinette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Robinette, 818 P.2d 1299, 109 Or. App. 477, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1604 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from his convictions for first degree manslaughter, ORS 163.118, and being a felon in possession of a firearm. ORS 166.270. The trial court imposed consecutive sentences for the convictions without making the appropriate findings. The state concedes that the trial court erred in that respect. State v. Racicot, 106 Or App 557, 809 P2d 726 (1991). We accept the concession.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from his convictions for first degree manslaughter, ORS 163.118, and being a felon in possession of a firearm. ORS 166.270. The trial court imposed consecutive sentences for the convictions without making the appropriate findings. The state concedes that the trial court erred in that respect. State v. Racicot, 106 Or App 557, 809 P2d 726 (1991). We accept the concession.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

818 P.2d 1299, 109 Or. App. 477, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-robinette-orctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack