State v. Robertson

182 So. 3d 942, 2016 La. LEXIS 5, 2016 WL 228160
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJanuary 8, 2016
DocketNo. 2015-KK-1911
StatusPublished

This text of 182 So. 3d 942 (State v. Robertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Robertson, 182 So. 3d 942, 2016 La. LEXIS 5, 2016 WL 228160 (La. 2016).

Opinion

Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 07-12-0625; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2015 KW1085.

11 Writ granted. The decision of the court of appeal is reversed and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated. Pursuant to La.C.Cr.P. art. 718, the trial court had discretion to order and conduct an in camera inspection of the documents to determine whether disclosure is required under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 So. 3d 942, 2016 La. LEXIS 5, 2016 WL 228160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-robertson-la-2016.