State v. Roberts

1 Del. Cas. 617
CourtDelaware County Court of Quarter Sessions
DecidedMay 15, 1819
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Del. Cas. 617 (State v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Delaware County Court of Quarter Sessions primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Roberts, 1 Del. Cas. 617 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1819).

Opinion

Chief Justice Booth said the Court decided this against us now.

Verdict guilty, on slight evidence.

The counsel filed motion in arrest of judgment, because the indictment had not concluded “against the peace and dignity of the State.” (State Constitution, Hawk and Bacon, 2 Hale P.C. 188, 1 Chit.Cr.L. 247.)

Per Curiam.

Let the former recognizance be respected.

Note. The point on which judgment was arrested was made before the jury, but the Court said it was improper there, for, if successful, defendant could not be indicted again.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Del. Cas. 617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-roberts-paqtrsessdelawa-1819.