State v. Roberts

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Roberts

75 S.W.3d 766, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 411, 2002 WL 341618

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 5, 2002

DocketNo. WD 59303

StatusPublished

This text of 75 S.W.3d 766 (State v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Roberts, 75 S.W.3d 766, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 411, 2002 WL 341618 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Randall T. Roberts, Jr., appeals from the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of involuntary manslaughter under section 565.024.1(2) RSMo Cum.Supp.1999. He contends that the trial court erred in admitting videotape evidence. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. A written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, prepared a memorandum for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Randall T. Roberts, Jr., appeals from the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of involuntary manslaughter under section 565.024.1(2) RSMo Cum.Supp.1999. He contends that the trial court erred in admitting videotape evidence. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. A written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, prepared a memorandum for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 S.W.3d 766, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 411, 2002 WL 341618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-roberts-moctapp-2002.