State v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Roberts

620 So. 2d 824, 1993 La. LEXIS 2151, 1993 WL 228377

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 25, 1993

DocketNo. 93-KK-1213

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 620 So. 2d 824 (State v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Roberts, 620 So. 2d 824, 1993 La. LEXIS 2151, 1993 WL 228377 (La. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Writ granted. The Court of Appeal judgment is reversed.

An insanity acquittee confined by the state is entitled to release when he has recovered his sanity or is no longer dangerous, i.e., he may be held as long as he is both mentally ill and dangerous, but no longer. Moreover, even if his continued confinement is constitutionally possible, the state may continue confinement only if it shows by clear and convincing evidence that he is mentally ill and dangerous. Foucha v. Louisiana, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1780, 118 L.Ed.2d 437 (1992). It is evident that at the time of the hearing below, which occurred prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in Foucka, the trial court did not apply these and perhaps other constitutional principles made clear by Fou-cha. Accordingly, the judgments of the trial court and the court of appeal are vacated and the case is remanded to the trial court for a new hearing in light of Foucka v. Louisiana, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1780, 118 L.Ed.2d 437 (1992).

WATSON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Writ granted. The Court of Appeal judgment is reversed.

An insanity acquittee confined by the state is entitled to release when he has recovered his sanity or is no longer dangerous, i.e., he may be held as long as he is both mentally ill and dangerous, but no longer. Moreover, even if his continued confinement is constitutionally possible, the state may continue confinement only if it shows by clear and convincing evidence that he is mentally ill and dangerous. Foucha v. Louisiana, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1780, 118 L.Ed.2d 437 (1992). It is evident that at the time of the hearing below, which occurred prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in Foucka, the trial court did not apply these and perhaps other constitutional principles made clear by Fou-cha. Accordingly, the judgments of the trial court and the court of appeal are vacated and the case is remanded to the trial court for a new hearing in light of Foucka v. Louisiana, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1780, 118 L.Ed.2d 437 (1992).

WATSON, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

620 So. 2d 824, 1993 La. LEXIS 2151, 1993 WL 228377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-roberts-la-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack