State v. Roberts

235 So. 2d 99, 256 La. 75, 1970 La. LEXIS 3861
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 25, 1970
DocketNo. 50582
StatusPublished

This text of 235 So. 2d 99 (State v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Roberts, 235 So. 2d 99, 256 La. 75, 1970 La. LEXIS 3861 (La. 1970).

Opinion

The application is denied. Applicant’s remedy is to renew his application in the event of his conviction.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. There is merit in the motion to quash and the applicant should not be forced to trial if there is no legal charge of a crime. He should not have to await conviction to seek redress from us on writ application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 So. 2d 99, 256 La. 75, 1970 La. LEXIS 3861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-roberts-la-1970.